嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈��
defence of usury-及3何蛍
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何! 泌惚云慕短嗤堋響頼���誅卒亮茂�俊彭堋響��辛聞喘貧圭 "辺茄欺厘議箝誓匂" 孔嬬 才 "紗秘慕禰" 孔嬬��
of trader whom he was accustomed to deal with in his solvent days�察�he sees a person who may accept of any rate of profit�察�without the smallest danger from any laws that are�察�or can be made against usury。 How idle�察�then�察�to think of stopping a man from making six�察�or seven�察�or eight per cent interest�察�when�察�if he chuses to run a risk proportionable�察�he may in this way make thirty or forty per cent or any rate you please。 And as to the prodigal�察�if he cannot get what he wants upon these terms�察�what chance is there of his getting it upon any terms�察�supposing the laws against usury to be away�拭�This then is another way�察�in which�察�instead of serving�察�it injures him�察�by narrowing his option�察�and driving him from a market which might have proved less disadvantageous�察�to a more disadvantageous one。 As far as prodigality�察�then�察�is concerned�察�I must confess�察�I cannot see the use of stopping the current of expenditure in this way at the fosset�察�when there are so many unpreventable ways of letting it run out of the bung´hole。 Whether any harm is done to society�察�upon the whole�察�by letting so much money drop at once out of the pockets of the prodigal�察�who would have gone on wasting it�察�into the till of the frugal tradesman�察�who will lay it up�察�is not worth the enquiry for the present purpose�此�what is plain is�察�that�察�so far as the saving the prodigal from paying at an extraordinary rate for what he gets to spend�察�is the object of the law�察�that object is not at all promoted�察�by fixing the rate of interest upon money borrowed。 On the contrary�察�if the law has any effect�察�it runs counter to that object�此�since�察�were he to borrow�察�it would only be�察�in as far as he could borrow at a rate inferior to that at which otherwise he would be obliged to buy。 Preventing his borrowing at an extra´rate�察�may have the effect of increasing his distress�察�but cannot have the effect of lessening it�此�allowing his borrowing at such a rate�察�might have the effect of lessening his distress�察�but could not have the effect of increasing it。 To put a stop to prodigality�察�if indeed it be worth while�察�I know but of one effectual course that can be taken�察�in addition to the incompleat and insufficient courses at present practicable。 and that is�察�to put the convicted prodigal under an interdict�察�as was practised formerly among the Romans�察�and is still practised among the French�察�and other nations who have taken the Roman law for the ground´work of their own。 But to discuss the expediency�察�or sketch out the details of such an institution。 belongs not to the present purpose。
LETTER IV Reasons for Restraint。 Protection of Indigence。
Besides prodigals�察�there are three other classes of persons�察�and but three�察�for whose security I can conceive these restrictive laws to have been designed。 I mean the indigent�察�the rashly enterprizing�察�and the simple�此�those whose pecuniary necessities may dispose them to give an interest above the ordinary rate。 rather than not have it�察�and those who�察�from rashness�察�may be disposed to venture upon giving such a rate�察�or from carelessness combined with ignorance�察�may be disposed to acquiesce in it。 In speaking of these three different classes of persons�察�I must beg leave to consider one of them at a time�此�and accordingly�察�in speaking of the indigent�察�I must consider indigence in the first place as untinctured with simplicity。 On this occasion。 I may suppose�察�and ought to suppose�察�no particular defect in a man's judgment�察�or his temper�察�that should mislead him�察�more than the ordinary run of men。 He knows what is his interest as well as they do�察�and is as well disposed and able to pursue it as they are。 I have already intimated�察�what I think is undeniable。 that there are no one or two or other limited number of rates of interest�察�that can be equally suited to the unlimited number of situations�察�in respect of the degree of exigency�察�in which a man is liable to find himself�此�insomuch that to the situation of a man�察�who by the use of money can make for example 11 per cent�察�six per cent is as well adapted�察�as 5 per cent is to the situation of him who can make but 10�察�to that of him who can make 12 per cent seven and so on。 So�察�in the case of his wanting it to save himself from a loss�察。�which is that which is most likely to be in view under the name of exigency�� if that loss would amount to 11 per cent 6 per cent is as well adapted to his situation�察�as 5 per cent would be to the situation of him�察�who had but a loss amounting to ten per cent to save himself from by the like means。 And in any case。 though。 in proportion to the amount of the loss�察�the rate of interest were even so great�察�as that the clear saving should not amount to more than one per cent or any fraction per cent yet so long as it amounted to any thing�察�he would be just so much the better for borrowing�察�even on such comparatively disadvantageous terms。 If�察�instead of gain�察�we put any other kind of benefit or advantage if�此�instead of loss。 we put any other kind of mischief or inconvenience�察�of equal value�察�the result will be the same。 A man is in one of these situations�察�suppose�察�in which it would be for his advantage to borrow。 But his circumstances are such�察�that it would not be worth any body's while to lend him�察�at the highest rate which it is proposed the law should allow�察�in short�察�he cannot get it at that rate。 If he thought he could get it at that rate�察�most surely he would not give a higher�此�he may he trusted for that�此�for by the supposition he has nothing defective in his understanding。 But the fact is�察�he cannot get it at that lower rate。 At a higher rate�察�however he could get it�此�and at that rate�察�though higher�察�it would be worth his while to get it�此�so he judges�察�who has nothing to hinder him from judging right�察�who has every motive and every means for forming a right judgment�察�who has every motive and every means for informing himself of the circumstances�察�upon which rectitude of judgment�察�in the case in question�察�depends。 The legislator�察�who knows nothing�察�nor can know any thing�察�of any one of all these circumstances�察�who knows nothing at all about the matter�察�comes and says to him ;It signifies nothing�察�you shall not have the money�此�for it would be doing you a mischief to let you borrow it upon such terms。; And this out of prudence and loving´kindness� �There may be worse cruelty。 but can there be greater folly�拭 �The folly of those who persist�察�as is supposed�察�without reason�察�in not taking advice�察�has been much expatiated upon。 But the folly of those who persist�察�without reason�察�in forcing their advice upon others�察�has been but little dwelt upon�察�though it is�察�perhaps�察�the more frequent�察�and the more flagrant of the two。 It is not often that one man is a better judge for another�察�than that other is for himself�察�even in Cases where the adviser will take the trouble to make himself master of as many of the materials for judging�察�as are within the reach of the person to be advised。 But the legislator is not�察�can not be�察�in the possession of any one of these materials。 What private�察�can be equal to such public folly�拭 �I should now speak of the enterprizing class of borrowers�此�those。 who�察�when characterized by a single term�察�are distinguished by the unfavourable appellation of projectors�此�but in what I shall have to say of them�察�Dr Smith�察�I begin to foresee�察�will bear so material a part�察�that when I come to enter upon that subject�察�I think to take my leave of you�察�and address myself to him。
LETTER V Reasons for Restraint。´Protection of Simplicity。
I come�察�lastly�察�to the case of the simple。 Here�察�in the first place�察�I think I am by this time entitled to observe�察�that no simplicity�察�short of absolute idiotism�察�can cause the individual to make a more groundless judgment�察�than the legislator�察�who�察�in the circumstances above stated�察�should pretend to confine him to any given rate of interest�察�would have made for him。 Another consideration�察�equally conclusive�察�is�察�that were the legislator's judgment ever so much superior to the individual's�察�how weak soever that may be�察�the exertion of it on this occasion can never be any otherwise than useless�察�so long as there are so many similar occasions�察�as there ever must be�察�where the simplicity of the individual is equally likely to make him a sufferer�察�and on which the legislator cannot interpose with effect�察�nor has ever so much as thought of interposing。 Buying goods with money�察�or upon credit�察�is the business of everyday。 borrowing money is the business�察�only�察�of some particular exigency�察�which�察�in comparison�察�can occur but seldom。 Regulating the prices of goods in general would be an endless task�察�and no legislator has ever been weak enough to think of attempting it。 And supposing he were to regulate the prices�察�what would that signify for the protection of simplicity�察�unless he were to regulate also the quantum of what each man should buy�拭�Such quantum is indeed regulated�察�or rather means are taken to prevent buying altogether�察�but in what cases�拭�In those only where the weakness is adjudged to have arrived at such a pitch�察�as to render a man utterly unqualified for the management of his affairs�此�in short�察�when it has arrived at the length of idiocy。 But in what degree soever a man's weakness may expose him to imposition�察�he stands much more exposed to it�察�in the way of buying goods�察�than in the way of borrowing money。 To be informed�察�beforehand�察�of the ordinary prices of all the sorts of things�察�a man may have occasion to buy�察�may be a task of considerable variety and extent。 To be informed of the ordinary rate of interest�察�is to be informed of one single fact�察�too interesting not to have attracted attention�察�and too simple to have escaped the memory。 A few per cent enhancement upon the price of goods�察�is a matter that may easily enough pass unheeded�察�but a single per cent beyond the ordinary interest of money�察�is a stride more conspicuous and startling�察�than many per cent upon the price of any kind of goods。 Even in regard to subjects�察�which�察�by their importance would�察�if any�察�justify a regulation of their price�察�such as for instance land�察�I question whether there ever was an instance where�察�without some such ground as�察�on the one side fraud�察�or suppression of facts necessary to form a jud
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何!
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��