嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈��
lecture vi-及6何蛍
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何! 泌惚云慕短嗤堋響頼���誅卒亮茂�俊彭堋響��辛聞喘貧圭 "辺茄欺厘議箝誓匂" 孔嬬 才 "紗秘慕禰" 孔嬬��
Emperor。 The majority in each committee�察�seeing that it was
impossible under present circumstances to maintain their old
rights over the person of the serf�察�consented to recognise his
freedom�察�and that without pay。 They were anxious about one thing
alone to retain as far as possible in their own hands the land
actually possessed by the peasant。 This feeling was the stronger
where the soil was rich�察�as was the case in the Central and
Southern Governments�察�where the black soil prevails。 It was less
so in the west and north�察�where the ground yielded but a small
rent。 We find a complete unanimity between the utterances of the
central and southern nobles�察�both insisting on the necessity of
limiting the expropriation of the land in favour of the peasants
to that occupied by their homesteads�察�whilst in the north more
than one committee consented to extend this to the arable land
and the undivided common。
The provincial committees were almost unanimous ��I speak of
course only of the majority of their members�� in their request
that the individual shares of each peasant household should be
readjusted according to a certain maximum and minimum fixed for
each province。 Many a committee insisted on the maintenance of
feudal police�察�if not of feudal justice�察�and all showed an equal
interest in the suppression of the uncontrolled power of the
bureaucracy in matters of provincial administration。
The minorities of almost every committee�察�who were more or
less influenced by the press�察�approached much more nearly in
their request to the views entertained by the majority in the
central committee。 They gave their consent to the plan of
expropriating in favour of the peasants a part of the noblemen's
lands�察�they insisted on the participation of the Government in
the act of redeeming the area formerly allotted by the landlords
to the serfs of their respective manors�察�they strongly opposed
the scheme of a transitory state in which the peasant�察�unable to
buy back the land he owned�察�was condemned to continue his villein
service and his feudal dues or payments in kind。 At the same time
they put forward certain general demands which went much beyond
the promises already given by the Government。 They made requests
for a general change in the existing system of provincial
administration。 According to these bureaucracy should give place
to a system of local self´government。 They insisted on the
necessity of amending the deficient judicial organisation。 They
demanded trial by jury and liberty of the press。 Some of the
members went even so far as to draw up a resolution in favour of
the general representation of the people and the revival of the
ancient system of National Councils�察�the Sobors。
We must not lose sight of these political requirements if we
wish to understand why it was that the Government�察�as soon as the
deputies both of the majority and the minority of provincial
committees were assembled in Petersburg�察�hindered their general
meetings。 It was but separately that each of the delegates was
admitted to put forward his requests�察�and to give oral advice to
the members of the general committee。 This mistrust on the part
of the Government embittered more than one of the delegates
against the members of the central committee�察�and threw them into
the arms of that minority which�察�in the central committee itself��
defended the interests of the nobility。 It was chiefly composed
of the ;Marshal; of the Petersburg nobility�察�Count Peter
Schouvalov�察�Mr Aprakasin�察�who occupied the same post in the
Government of Orel�察�and Mr Posen�察�the delegate of Pultawa。 These
three gentlemen insisted on the desirability of keeping the land
in the hands of the nobility�察�and of granting to the peasantry
only a sort of soccage´tenure�察�or ;censive�察─�on the land they
occupied。 Whilst the majority of the committee insisted on the
direct interference of the Government in the redemption of the
noblemen's land�察�and the propriety of putting an end to
villein´service�察�at any rate after a period of twelve years��
these gentlemen were in favour of leaving to a free contract��
entered into by the manorial lord and his former serfs�察�the
difficult task of settling their future relations。 It was in the
house of Schouvalov that the discontented delegates regularly
assembled�察�it was there that they drew up this protest against
the action of the central committee and the so´called
;encroachments of the bureaucracy。; Their appeal�察�made in the
form of a pamphlet�察�published in Leipsig�察�and addressed to the
new delegates summoned to Petersburg from the provinces not
hitherto represented�察�found a ready hearing�察�and the Government
encountered in these new helpers even a larger amount of mistrust
and ill´will than that already shown by their predecessors。
This time the opposition of the nobility was of much greater
consequence。 General Rostovzov�察�whose influence over the Czar was
very great�察�died suddenly�察�before the completion of the work
entrusted to his care�察�and Count Panin�察�an avowed foe to the
action of the committee�察�became its President。 He did his best to
induce the members to abandon their former decision�察�and it is
only to the firmness of character shown by men like Nicholas
Milutine�察�that we are indebted for the strict maintenance of the
general outlines of the form already elaborated。 Finding himself
powerless to change the decisions of the committee�察�Panin tried
to arouse some opposition to the scheme published by it�察�among
the ranks of that general committee of which the committee for
the elaboration of the law of emancipation was but a section。 He
tried to achieve the same ends in the Council of State�察�where the
scheme of the new law had finally to be discussed。 Happily the
time allowed for the debates was very limited�察�as the Government
insisted on the immediate realisation of the long´promised
;liberty。; They lasted in the general committee but a few months��
while in the Council of State they were limited to a fortnight。
It is due to this fact that neither of the two boards introduced
very extensive amendments in the emancipation law。 Those they did
make were all in favour of the nobility。 The most mischievous
consisted in the considerable diminution of the maximum and
minimum shares accorded to the peasant�察�and in the resolution
that no rights would be recognised as belonging to the villagers
in the common pastures of the manor。 The interests of the
peasants were also sacrificed in the permission which was given
to the landlords to diminish the shares of the peasants�察�on the
condition of renouncing all remuneration for the ground which
they ceded。 In all these measures the demands of the nobles were
complied with。
But the great ends at which the reformers aimed�察�the
liberation�察�that is to say�察�of the peasant from all personal
dependence on the manorial lord�察�and the securing to him the
right of possessing land in common�察�were nevertheless attained。
The law of February 19�察�1861�察�was the beginning of a new era
an era of democratic development�察�as well as of economic and
social growth�察�for the immense Empire of the Czars。 For there is
no doubt about the vast influence which the law of 1861 has
exercised in all directions。 It is that which made more than
twenty millions of people at once the free disposers of their own
destinies and the communistic owners of the land。 Villein
services�察�rents in kind and in money�察�feudal monopolies�察�and
manorial jurisdiction�察�ceased to exist�察�and the peasant became
the member of a self´governing body�察�or the Mir。 The ideas of
social justice and of equality before the law ideas hitherto
cherished but by a few dreamers such as Radischev and Herzen�察�or
revolutionists like those so´called ;Decembrists�察─�who organised
the rebellion of December 24�察�1825 made their triumphant entry
into the Russian world�察�working a complete change in the
organisation of public schools�察�admitting the son of the peasant
to sit side by side with the son of the nobleman and the merchant
in the same grammar school and the same university��
revolutionising both official circles and the drawing´room��
admitting to both persons of low。 birth but high education。
The emancipation of the serf certainly was not carried out
without some loss to the land´owning gentry�察�but the squire soon
recovered from the state into which he was brought by his
inexperience in the management of his estate without the help of
unpaid servants。 Capital was invested in land�察�agricultural
machines were introduced�察�the yearly income began to rise
rapidly�察�and with it the value of the land was augmented。 It was
partly enhanced by the fact that it was thrown open to the free
purchase of all classes of society�察�while previous to the reform
the higher class alone was entitled to own it。 Instead of
abandoning the tillage of the fields�察�according to the
expectation of some pessimists�察�the liberated serf soon became
the regular farmer of the lands possessed by the gentry�察�and
entire village communities have been seen during these last few
years renting�察�under conditions of mutual responsibility�察�the
land of a neighbouring estate。
If we investigate the indirect results of the great reform
accomplished by the Emperor Alexander�察�we are first struck by the
fact that it involved the necessity of a complete change in
provincial administration。 Justice and police had hitherto been
in the hands of persons elected by the nobility。 This could no
longer be tolerated the moment the serf was liberated from his
previous subjection to the noble and squire。 A system of
provincial self´government�察�based on the principle of
representation of the whole land´owning class�察�both private
proprietors and those possessing land in common�察�was introduced
in its stead。 The organization of justice was completely changed��
learned jurists occupying the place of the ignorant magistrates
of old who had been appointed by the provincial gentry。 The
people�察�as members of juries�察�were admitted to a share in the
exercise of criminal justice。 The transformation of the medieval
State into one that answered to the requirements of modern
civilisation would have been completed if the Liberat
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何!
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��