嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈��
shorter logic-及49何蛍
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何! 泌惚云慕短嗤堋響頼���誅卒亮茂�俊彭堋響��辛聞喘貧圭 "辺茄欺厘議箝誓匂" 孔嬬 才 "紗秘慕禰" 孔嬬��
actuality is the more comprehensive�察�because it is the concrete thought which includes possibility
as an abstract element。 And that superiority is to some extent expressed in our ordinary mode of
thought when we speak of the possible�察�in distinction from the actual�察�as only possible。 Possibility
is often said to consist in a thing's being thinkable。
'Think' however�察�in this use of the word�察�only means to conceive any content under the form of an
abstract identity。 Now�察�every content can be brought under this form�察�since nothing is required
except to separate it from the relation in which it stands。 Hence�察�any content�察�however absurd and
nonsensical�察�can be viewed as possible。 It is possible that the moon may fall upon the Earth
tonight�察�for the moon is a body separate from the Earth and may as well fall down upon it as a
stone thrown into the air does。 。 。 。 In language like this about possibilities�察�it is chiefly the law of
sufficient ground or reason which is manipulated in the style already explained。 Everything�察�it is
said�察�is possible�察�for which you can state some ground。 The less education a man has�察�or in other
words�察�the less he knows of the specific connection of the objects to which he directs his
observations�察�the greater is his tendency to launch out into all sorts of empty possibilities。 An
instance of this habit in the political sphere is seen in the pot´house politician。 In practical life too it
is no uncommon thing to see ill will and indolence slink behind the category of possibility�察�in order
to escape definite obligations。 To such conduct the same remarks apply as were made in
connection with the law of sufficient ground。 Reasonable and practical men refused to be imposed
upon by the possible�察�for the simple ground that it is possible only。 They stick to the actual ��not
meaning by that word merely whatever immediately is now and here��。 Many of the proverbs of
common life express the same contempt for what is abstractly possible。 'A bird in the hand is
worth two in the bush'。
Everything is Possible ��
After all�察�there is as good reason for taking everything to be impossible as to be possible�此�for every
content ��a content is always concrete�� includes not only diverse but even opposite characteristics。
Nothing is so impossible for instance�察�as this�察�that I am�此�for 'I' is at the same time simple
self´relation and�察�as undoubtedly�察�relation to something else。 The same may be seen in every other
fact in the natural or spiritual world。 Matter�察�it may be said�察�is impossible�此�for it is the unity of
attraction and repulsion。 The same is true of life�察�law�察�freedom 。 。 。
Generally speaking�察�it is the empty understanding which haunts these empty forms�此�and the
business of philosophy in the matter is to show how null and meaningless they are。 Whether a thing
is possible or impossible�察�depends altogether on the subject´matter�此�that is�察�on the sum total of the
elements in actuality�察�which�察�as it opens itself out�察�discloses itself to be necessity。
�拭�
′ 144
��b�А�Contingency ��accidents��
But the Actual in its distinction from possibility ��which is reflection´into´self�� is
only the outward concrete�察�the unessential immediate。 In other words�察�to such
extent as the actual is primarily the simple merely immediate unity of Inward and
Outward�察�it is obviously made an unessential outward�察�and thus at the same time
it is merely inward�察�the abstraction of reflection´into´self。 Hence it is itself
characterised as a merely possible。 When thus valued at the rate of a mere
possibility�察�the actual is a Contingent or Accidental�察�and�察�conversely�察�possibility
is mere Accident itself or Chance。
′ 145
Possibility and Contingency
Possibility and Contingency are the two factors of Actuality ´ Inward and
Outward�察�put as mere forms which constitute the externality of the actual。 They
have their reflection´into´self on the body of actual fact�察�or content�察�with its
intrinsic definitiveness which gives essential ground of their characterisation。 The
finitude of the contingent and the possible lies�察�therefore�察�as we now see�察�in the
distinction of the form´determination from the content�此�and�察�therefore�察�it depends
on the content alone whether anything is contingent and possible。
′ 145n
Free Will
As possibility is the mere inside of actuality�察�it is for that reason a mere outside actuality�察�in other
words�察�Contingency。 The contingent�察�roughly speaking�察�is what has the ground of its being not in
itself but in somewhat else。 Such is the aspect under which actuality first comes before
consciousness�察�and which is often mistaken for actuality itself。 But the contingent is only one side
of the actual ´ the side namely�察�of reflection on somewhat else。 It is the actual�察�in the signification of
something merely possible。 Accordingly we consider the contingent to be what may or may not
be�察�what may be in one way or another�察�whose being or not´being�察�and whose being in this way or
otherwise�察�depends not upon itself but on something else。
To overcome this contingency is�察�roughly speaking�察�the problem of science on the one hand�察�as in
the range of practice�察�on the other�察�the end of action is to rise above the contingency of the will�察�or
above caprice。 It has however often happened�察�most of all in modern times�察�that contingency has
been unwarrantably elevated�察�and has a value attached to it�察�both in nature and in the world of the
mind�察�to which it has no just claim。 Frequently�察�Nature�察�to take it first�察�has been chiefly admired for
the richness and variety of its structures。 Apart however from what disclosure it contains of the
Idea�察�this richness gratifies none of the higher interests of Reason�察�and its vast variety of structures��
organic and inorganic�察�affords us only the spectacle of a contingency losing itself in vagueness。 At
any rate�察�the chequered scene presented by the several varieties of animals and plants�察�conditioned
as it is by outward circumstances ´ the complex changes in configuration and grouping of clouds��
and the like ´ ought not to be ranked higher than the equally casual fancies of the mind which
surrenders itself to its own caprices。 The wonderment with which such phenomena are welcomed
is a most abstract frame of mind�察�from which one should advance to a closer insight into the inner
harmony and uniformity of nature。
�拭�
Of contingency in respect of the Will it is especially important to form a proper estimate。 The
Freedom of the Will is an expression that often means mere free choice�察�or the will in the form of
contingency。 Freedom of choice�察�or the capacity for determining ourselves towards one thing or
another�察�or is undoubtedly a vital element in the will ��which is in its very notion free���察�but instead of
being freedom itself�察�it is it is only in the first instance a freedom in form。 The genuinely free will��
which includes free choice as suspended�察�is conscious to itself that its content is intrinsically firm
and fast�察�and knows it at the same time to be thoroughly its own。 A will�察�on the contrary�察�which
remains standing on the grade of option�察�even supposing it does decide in favour of what is in
import right and true�察�is always haunted by the conceit that it might�察�if it had so pleased�察�have
decided in favour of the reverse course。 When more narrowly examined�察�free choice is seen to be
a contradiction�察�to this extent�察�that its form and content stand in antithesis。 The matter of choice is
given�察�and known as a content dependent not on the will itself�察�but on outward circumstances。 In
reference to such a given content�察�freedom lies only in the form of choosing�察�which�察�as it is only a
freedom in form�察�may consequently be regarded as freedom only in supposition。 On an ultimate
analysis it will be seen that the same outwardness of circumstances�察�on which is founded the
content that the will finds to its hand�察�can alone account for the will giving its decision for the one
and not the other of the two alternatives。
Although contingency�察�as it has thus been shown�察�is only one aspect in the whole of actuality�察�and
therefore not to be mistaken for the whole of actuality�察�and therefore not to be mistaken for
actuality itself�察�it has no less than the rest of the forms of the idea its due office in the world of
objects。 This is�察�in the first place�察�seen in Nature。 On the surface of Nature�察�so to speak�察�Chance
ranges unchecked�察�and the contingency must simply be recognised�察�without the pretension
sometimes erroneously ascribed to philosophy�察�in seeking to find it in a
could´only´be´so´and´not´otherwise。 Nor is contingency less visible in the world of Mind。 The
Will�察�as we have already remarked�察�includes contingency under the shape of option or free choice��
but only as a vanishing and abrogated element。 In respect of Mind and its works�察�just as in the
case of Nature�察�we must guard against being so far misled by a well´meant endeavour after
rational knowledge�察�as to try to exhibit the necessity of phenomena which are marked by a
decided contingency�察�or�察�as the phrase is�察�to construe them a priori。 Thus in language ��although it
be�察�as it were�察�the body of thought�� Chance still unquestionably plays a decided part�察�and the same
is true of the creations of law�察�of art�察�etc。
The problem of science�察�and especially of philosophy�察�undoubtedly consists in eliciting the
necessity concealed under the semblance of contingency。 That�察�however�察�is far from meaning that
the contingent belongs to our subjective conception alone�察�and must therefore be simply set aside��
if we wish to get at the truth。 All scientific researches which pursue this tendency exclusively lay
themselves open to the charge of mere jugglery and an over´strained precisionism。
′ 146
Condition
When more closely examined�察�what the aforesaid outward side of actuality
implies is this。 Contingency�察�which is actuality in its immediacy�察�is the
self´identical�察�essentially only as a supp
酔楯荷恬: 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈 梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈 梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何!
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��